On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:26:54PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > ext4 has a data corruption case when doing non-block-aligned > asynchronous direct IO into a sparse file, as demonstrated > by xfstest 240. Hey Eric, One question about this patch. You are currently using a hashed array of size 37 for the waitqueue; what about using a similarly sized hashed array for the aio_mutex? We only take it for unaligned mutexes, and I'm trying to work on reducing the size of ext4 inode, since it gets rather large in the inode cache.... - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
