Re: [PATCH] exofs: simple fsync race fix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/25/2010 01:50 PM, Nick Piggin wrote:
> This is fine, we'll get it merged before 2.6.37, just give a couple of
> days for review, I haven't had much confirmation from other vfs people
> about these problems.
> 
> Thanks,
> Nick
> 

Hi Dear Nick.

So I was cleaning the table and I fell on this patch. What ever happened
to it? should I push it through my tree?

Thanks
Boaz

> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:52:08PM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>> From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> It is incorrect to test inode dirty bits without participating in the inode
>> writeback protocol. Inode writeback sets I_SYNC and clears I_DIRTY_?, then
>> writes out the particular bits, then clears I_SYNC when it is done. BTW. it
>> may not completely write all pages out, so I_DIRTY_PAGES would get set
>> again.
>>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux