Re: [PATCH 2/3] ext4 : Pass GFP_KERNEL for transaction allocation if caller can handler failures

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Ted Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:44:25AM -0800, Manish Katiyar wrote:
>>
>> Do you mean separate patch for each of the changed functions ?
>
> Unless the cleanups for a set of functions are all the same issue,
> yes.  The idea is that commit description should apply to all of the
> patch hunks in the commit.
>
> That way if there is a problem, it becomes easier to bisect and then
> determine what's going on by reading the commit description.  It also
> becomes easier to review the changes, as well.
>
> Does that make sense?

Hi Ted,

Resending the above patch broken in following series of patch.

-- 
Thanks -
Manish
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux