On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 07:50:57PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:12:55AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote: > > This makes sense. would it possible N flush data payloads delay the > > first request? > > I ended up with a different design. Still buggy. It triggers a weird > oops under stress test but other than that things generally seem to > work as expected. Please read the comment at the top of blk-flush.c > for more info. I'll post properly after more testing and debugging. The oops was caused by debugging code I put in (not posted together). It runs fine without it, so if you have some time, please give it a spin. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
