Hi Ted, In function fix_uninit_block_bitmaps(ext2_filsys fs), also have overflow issue. I've send this patch before. http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg20570.html Maybe this patch can help you to avoid another overflow bug. Yours sincerely, Hsuan-Ting. 2011/1/8 Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> > > real_end had been previously declared with a bogus type, which is why > this was missed earlier. > > Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx> > --- > resize/resize2fs.c | 8 ++++---- > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/resize/resize2fs.c b/resize/resize2fs.c > index 55e5512..216a626 100644 > --- a/resize/resize2fs.c > +++ b/resize/resize2fs.c > @@ -294,7 +294,7 @@ errcode_t adjust_fs_info(ext2_filsys fs, ext2_filsys old_fs, > blk64_t overhead = 0; > blk64_t rem; > blk64_t blk, group_block; > - ext2_ino_t real_end; > + blk64_t real_end; > blk64_t adj, old_numblocks, numblocks, adjblocks; > unsigned long i, j, old_desc_blocks, max_group; > unsigned int meta_bg, meta_bg_size; > @@ -381,9 +381,9 @@ retry: > fs->inode_map); > if (retval) goto errout; > > - real_end = ((EXT2_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(fs->super) > - * fs->group_desc_count)) - 1 + > - fs->super->s_first_data_block; > + real_end = (((blk64_t) EXT2_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(fs->super) * > + fs->group_desc_count)) - 1 + > + fs->super->s_first_data_block; > retval = ext2fs_resize_block_bitmap2(ext2fs_blocks_count(fs->super)-1, > real_end, fs->block_map); > > -- > 1.7.3.1 > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
