On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 12:13:37 MST, Andreas Dilger said: > On 2011-01-04, at 11:21, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote: > > On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 16:56:58 +0800, yangsheng said: > >> If atime has been wrong set to future, then it cannot > >> be updated back to current time. > >> > >> +#define RELATIME_MARGIN (24 * 60 * 60) > > > > Nice patch overall. Should this be a #define, or a CONFIG_ variable, > > or a tweakable /proc/sys/fs variable? Or am I senile and we thrashed > > all this out once before when the relatime code landed? > > I recall the consensus was that a /proc tunable was "too much" for the > initial patch. OK, in that case yangsheng's patch is probably good to go.
Attachment:
pgpUEVeYSNWTt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
