On Mon, 3 Jan 2011, Lukas Czerner wrote: > On Thu, 25 Nov 2010, Lukas Czerner wrote: > > > When determining last group through ext4_get_group_no_and_offset() the > > result may be wrong in cases when range->start and range-len are too > > big, because it may overflow when summing up those two numbers. > > > > Fix that by checking range->len and limit its value to > > ext4_blocks_count(). This commit was tested by myself with expected > > result. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 4 ++++ > > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > > index 5b4d4e3..7b05d92 100644 > > --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > > +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c > > @@ -4819,6 +4819,7 @@ int ext4_trim_fs(struct super_block *sb, struct fstrim_range *range) > > ext4_group_t group, ngroups = ext4_get_groups_count(sb); > > ext4_grpblk_t cnt = 0, first_block, last_block; > > uint64_t start, len, minlen, trimmed; > > + ext4_fsblk_t blocks_count = ext4_blocks_count(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es); > > int ret = 0; > > > > start = range->start >> sb->s_blocksize_bits; > > @@ -4826,6 +4827,9 @@ int ext4_trim_fs(struct super_block *sb, struct fstrim_range *range) > > minlen = range->minlen >> sb->s_blocksize_bits; > > trimmed = 0; > > > > + if (len > blocks_count) > > + len = blocks_count - start; > > + > > if (unlikely(minlen > EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb))) > > return -EINVAL; > > > > > > Hi Ted, > > what is the status of this one? > > Thanks! > -Lukas > Oh, please ignore this, I just found "already applied" message. Sorry for the noise. -Lukas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
