Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: Do not dispatch FITRIM through separate super_operation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 09:01:02AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
> That is my intent already, thanks.  Just needs time, perhaps this winter.

This wasn't addressed at you, but a snide remark at Greg, who is just
contantly bickering without actually beeing any help.

> I think a reasonable approach would be to modify the existing interfaces
> so that the LLD can report a "max discard ranges per command" back up
> the stack.
> 
> This way, libata could report a max of say, 64 ranges per "discard" (trim),
> and DM/RAID could simply (for now) report a max of one range per discard.

That's certainly the easy way out.  You'll need a good way to actually
transport the ranges as we can't simply sote them in bi_sector/bi_size
and adapt the whole block layer to deal with the two types of different
discards.  Not saying it's impossible, but when I tried it before it
wasn't pretty.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux