On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 08:36:48AM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote: > There was concern that FITRIM ioctl is not common enough to be included > in core vfs ioctl, as Christoph Hellwig pointed out there's no real point > in dispatching this out to a separate vector instead of just through > ->ioctl. Um, are you and Josef working independently of each other? You don't seem to be cc'ing each other on your patches, and you're basically doing the same thing. -- Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
