[PATCH] ext4: Remove useless spinlock in ext4_getattr()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus noted, and complained to me, that doing while lots of "git
diff"'s of kernel sources, these spinlocks were responsible for 27% of
the CPU on his two-processor system as reported by perf.

Git was doing lots of parallel stats, and this was putting a lot of
pressure on ext4_getattr().  A spinlock to protect a single
memory-to-memory copy is pointless, so remove it.

Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
---
 fs/ext4/inode.c |    2 --
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 1916164..4d78342 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -5410,9 +5410,7 @@ int ext4_getattr(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct dentry *dentry,
 	 * will return the blocks that include the delayed allocation
 	 * blocks for this file.
 	 */
-	spin_lock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_block_reservation_lock);
 	delalloc_blocks = EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks;
-	spin_unlock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_block_reservation_lock);
 
 	stat->blocks += (delalloc_blocks << inode->i_sb->s_blocksize_bits)>>9;
 	return 0;
-- 
1.7.3.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux