On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Ted Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 09:54:23PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> >> Hm, unfortunately NO (see logs). >> >> I have compiled via M=fs/ext4 in an already compiled build-tree with >> these 3 patches. > > Ok, stupid question. ÂYou did make sure the new ext4 module was > loaded, right? > >> [ Â100.884524] ------------[ cut here ]------------ >> [ Â100.884718] kernel BUG at /home/sd/src/linux-2.6/linux-2.6.36/debian/build/source_i386_none/fs/ext4/inode.c:2721! > > OK, so after the patch, line 2721: changed from page_buffers() to: > > Â Âif (!page_has_buffers(page)) > > page_has_buffers() expands to: > > #define page_has_buffers(page) ÂPagePrivate(page) > > which expands to test_bit() call to see if PG_private1 is set in > page->flags. ÂThere is no BUG_ON anywhere there as far as I can tell. > > Line 2721 in the older kernel was page_has_buffers() which does have a > BUG_ON check. > > Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â- Ted > I created a new ext4.ko via "make M=fs/ext4" in the build-dir and copied the the kernel-module to /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/kernel/fs/ext4/, is that not enough? If not, I have to recompile a new kernel. - Sedat - -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
