Hi all, is is really a good idea to allow the filesystem to mount if something like that comes up? I really would prefer if mount would abort. Oct 22 12:37:36 vm7 kernel: [ 1227.814294] LDISKFS-fs warning (device sfa0074): ldiskfs_clear_journal_err: Filesystem error recorded from p revious mount: IO failure Oct 22 12:37:36 vm7 kernel: [ 1227.814314] LDISKFS-fs warning (device sfa0074): ldiskfs_clear_journal_err: Marking fs in need of filesystem check. (please ignore "ldiskfs", it was just renamed to that by Lustre, but is ext4 based as in RHEL5.5, so 2.6.32-ish). I'm testing with a DDN prototype storage system, which still has some issues and IO errors come up on certain storage side operations. We have pacemaker resource agent, that already refuses mount to mount, if the superblock has the error flag. But obviously that cannot work, if the flag is only set at mount time. The device was mounted read-only before, but somehow no error flag was set in the superblock Oct 22 12:10:39 vm7 kernel: [55827.998615] LDISKFS-fs (sfa0074): Remounting filesystem read-only Oct 22 12:10:39 vm7 kernel: [55827.998619] LustreError: 2569:0:(filter.c:190:filter_finish_transno()) wrote trans 416613470762 for client 9 c62eca5-08e4-d60d-9883-2a2140085b6c at #15: err = -30 Other devices that also have been mounted read-only do get the flag however. Maybe it couldn't set the flag due to the IO error? Thanks, Bernd -- Bernd Schubert DataDirect Networks -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
