Re: uninit_bg compatibility?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:28:51PM +0200, Bo Brantén wrote:
> 
> when writing new files to an ext4 file system using the Windows
> driver fsck will later complain "Group descriptor nn checksum is
> invalid" and I think that is because it used an yet unused block
> group without knowing that they can be marked as uninitialized. So I
> thought a simple patch would be to mount the file system read-only
> if that feature is in use untill the driver is updated with full
> write support but I can't find the flag to use, there is no
> EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_UNINIT_BG so I thought I ask here if anyone
> could clear this out.

Yeah, this is one where we decided to change the feature to uninit_bg
(since that describes the net benefit to the end-user), but we never
ended up changing the name of the flag in the source code.  The
feature flag in question is:

#define EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_GDT_CSUM		0x0010

I'll note that the Windows driver must not be checking the feature
flags, since the whole point of RO_COMPAT flags is that if a file
system implementation (such as the Windows drivers) sees an RO_COMPAT
flag it doesn't understand, it's supposed to treat the file system as
read-only.

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux