Re: [PATCH 0/5 v2] Lazy itable initialization for Ext4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v2] Lazy itable initialization for Ext4
From: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 10:29:43 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@xxxxxxxxxx>, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, rwheeler@xxxxxxxxxx, sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx, tytso@xxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <269DB810-0438-41D3-BB6D-F218190924B7@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23)

On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Andreas Dilger wrote:

> On 2010-09-08, at 11:49, Lukas Czerner wrote:
> > Graph attached.
> 
> I assume the groups are "unpatched", "noinititable", "MULT=10, "MULT=5", and "MULT=2"?
> 
> Cheers, Andreas
> 

Of course, sorry about that. Fixed graph attached.

-Lukas

Attachment: output.png
Description: PNG image

References:
- [PATCH 0/5 v2] Lazy itable initialization for Ext4
  - From: Lukas Czerner
- Re: [PATCH 0/5 v2] Lazy itable initialization for Ext4
  - From: Lukas Czerner
- Re: [PATCH 0/5 v2] Lazy itable initialization for Ext4
  - From: Andreas Dilger

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix 50% disk write performance regression
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/5] Add inode table initialization code for Ext4
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v2] Lazy itable initialization for Ext4
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/5 v2] Lazy itable initialization for Ext4
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Reiser Filesystem Development] [Ceph FS] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux FS] [Yosemite National Park] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux