On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, Ted Ts'o wrote: > > I'll repropose the patchset with __deprecated as you suggested. Thanks! > > And what Dave and I are saying is that we'll either need to do our on > loop to avoid the deprecation warning, or the use of the deprecated > function will probably be used forever... > We certainly hope that nobody will reimplement the same function without the __deprecated warning, especially for order < PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER where there's no looping at a higher level. So perhaps the best alternative is to implement the same _nofail() functions but do a WARN_ON(get_order(size) > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) instead? I think it's really sad that the caller can't know what the upper bounds of its memory requirement are ahead of time or at least be able to implement a memory freeing function when kmalloc() returns NULL. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
