On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Which is hopefully what you want. If you want exactly what is shown
> below, you can also pull the "next" branch, which omits the merge, and
> then you can deal with the merge conflict by hand. The results should
> be the same either way.
I did that just to see what it looked like.
One annoyance: I now get
fs/jbd2/transaction.c: In function ‘start_this_handle’:
fs/jbd2/transaction.c:98: warning: unused variable ‘ts’
due to that 'ts' thing only being used for the CONFIG_JBD2_DEBUG case.
Please fix. I'd suggest putting that CONFIG_JBD2_DEBUG code in a
helper function of its own, and declaring 'ts' there instead.
Suggested patch (but with a horrible helper function name) attached.
Linus
Attachment:
diff
Description: Binary data
