Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> writes: > On Mon 02-08-10 09:22:12, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: >> Akira Fujita <a-fujita@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > Hi ext3 maintainers, >> > >> > Could you look into this? >> > If this is not a problem, it is good though. >> Actually this is a problem. Because this issue makes quota just a fake >> limit. I've done this test for ext4 and was satisfied with result, >> but was too lazy to perform it on ext3/2 :( >> At least we have to have testcase for that in xfstest-qa. >> It seems that private page_mkwrite will be sufficient. >> I'm working on that. > Yes, it's a long standing bug. Another manifestation of the bug is that > we just throw away user's data without warning if we really cannot find > space for it. Fixing it isn't completely trivial - doing block allocation > during page_mkwrite really sucks performance-wise (tried that) so we > basically have to implement delayed allocation for ext3 (and other > filesystems) for mmaped writes and do reservation on page_mkwrite time and > allocation on writepage time. I already have patches doing that but they > depended on the truncate rewrite patch series and that was dragging on and > on for half an year or so. Now I guess it's right time to rebase them and > start pushing them again... Indeed. Let implement it similar to ext4 "do not reserve quota space for metadata but only for data". And speculatively charge metadata during allocation. This makes page_mkwrite() simple and clean. > > Honza -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
