Re: ext4 performance regression 2.6.27-stable versus 2.6.32 and later

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 30.07.2010 04:20, schrieb Ted Ts'o:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 09:51:48PM +0200, Kay Diederichs wrote:

When looking at the I/O statistics while the benchmark is running, we
see very choppy patterns for 2.6.32, but quite smooth stats for
2.6.27-stable.

Could you try to do two things for me?  Using (preferably from a
recent e2fsprogs, such as 1.41.11 or 12) run filefrag -v on the files
created from your 2.6.27 run and your 2.6.32 run?

Secondly can capture blktrace results from 2.6.27 and 2.6.32?  That
would be very helpful to understand what might be going on.

Either would be helpful; both would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

						- Ted

Ted,

a typical example of filefrag -v output for 2.6.27.48 is

 Filesystem type is: ef53
File size of /mnt/md5/scratch/nfs-test/tmp/xds/frames/h2g28_1_00000.cbf is 6229688 (1521 blocks, blocksize 4096)
 ext logical physical expected length flags
   0       0 796160000            1024
   1    1024 826381312 796161023    497 eof

(99 out of 100 files have 2 extents)

whereas for 2.6.32.16 the result is typically
Filesystem type is: ef53
File size of /mnt/md5/scratch/nfs-test/tmp/xds/frames/h2g28_1_00000.cbf is 6229688 (1521 blocks, blocksize 4096)
 ext logical physical expected length flags
   0       0 826376200            1521 eof
/mnt/md5/scratch/nfs-test/tmp/xds/frames/h2g28_1_00000.cbf: 1 extent found

(99 out of 100 files have 1 extent)

We'll try the blktrace ASAP and report back.

thanks,

Kay

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux