On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 02:42:13PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Saying things like "sync failed" when a device does > not support barriers makes users slightly more worried than > they need to be; rather than talking about sync failures, > let's just state the barrier-based facts. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > diff --git a/fs/jbd2/commit.c b/fs/jbd2/commit.c > index 75716d3..3d15b28 100644 > --- a/fs/jbd2/commit.c > +++ b/fs/jbd2/commit.c > @@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ static int journal_submit_commit_record(journal_t *journal, > */ > if (ret == -EOPNOTSUPP && barrier_done) { > printk(KERN_WARNING > - "JBD: barrier-based sync failed on %s - " > - "disabling barriers\n", journal->j_devname); > + "JBD2: Disabling barriers on %s, " > + "not supported by device\n", journal->j_devname); > spin_lock(&journal->j_state_lock); > journal->j_flags &= ~JBD2_BARRIER; > spin_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock); > @@ -180,8 +180,8 @@ retry: > wait_on_buffer(bh); > if (buffer_eopnotsupp(bh) && (journal->j_flags & JBD2_BARRIER)) { > printk(KERN_WARNING > - "JBD2: wait_on_commit_record: sync failed on %s - " > - "disabling barriers\n", journal->j_devname); > + "JBD2: %s: barriers no longer supported on %s - " > + "disabling barriers\n", __func__, journal->j_devname); Any reason this message has "no longer supported" as opposed to the "not supported by device" printed above? - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html