On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 01:27:44PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Requiring an immediate pre-fsck before printing a minimum
> resize size seems a bit draconian; if the fs isn't clean or marked
> with error, then certainly, but for an informational minimum
> size, I don't think we need to require a fsck since last mount.
>
> I had simply copied the checks from the actual resize path,
> previously.
>
> Installers use this option (-P) to gather minimum resize info,
> and requiring an actual fsck before use just seems to go too far.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Makes sense. I've added it to the e2fsprogs maint branch.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
