Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Further, it opens up the possibility that further down the track > someone modifies S_* flag values (say when adding some XFS > functionality) and corrupts extN filesystems all over the place. > There isn't even compiler guards to catch someone modifying the S_* > flags in a way that makes it incompatible with the extN on-disk > definitions. That occurred to me after I sent the patch. I can add some preprocessor guards for this. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
