Re: ext2 issues with xfstests 113

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue 01-06-10 11:03:37, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 11:31:01PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> >   Hmm, interesting because I've run test 113 again with a kernel somewhere
> > between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35-rc1 and the filesystem is clean. So probably you
> > are able to hit some kind of race I'm not able to. Could you check whether
> > the corruption is caused by the O_DIRECT run or some other one?
> 
> 113 is an AIO test, so it must be using O_DIRECT.
  Why? Looking at aio-stress source and 113 script, two of aio-stress runs
use buffered IO and only the last one uses O_DIRECT...

> >   Also could you get "e2image -r" of the filesystem, bzip2 it and put it
> > somewhere for download?
> 
> I've jyst attached it as the compressed version is small enough (88k).
  Thanks, I'll have a look whether I can guess something.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux