If the EOFBLOCK_FL flag is set when it should not be and the inode is
zero length, then eh_entries is zero, and ex is NULL, so dereferencing
ex to print ex->ee_block causes a kernel OOPS in
ext4_ext_map_blocks().
On top of that, the error message which is printed isn't very helpful.
So we fix this by printing something more explanatory which doesn't
involve trying to print ex->ee_block.
Addresses-Google-Bug: #2655740
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
---
fs/ext4/extents.c | 9 +++++----
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index 595ab6d..aeec5c7 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -3370,8 +3370,9 @@ int ext4_ext_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
*/
if (unlikely(path[depth].p_ext == NULL && depth != 0)) {
EXT4_ERROR_INODE(inode, "bad extent address "
- "iblock: %d, depth: %d pblock %lld",
- map->m_lblk, depth, path[depth].p_block);
+ "lblock: %lu, depth: %d pblock %lld",
+ (unsigned long) map->m_lblk, depth,
+ path[depth].p_block);
err = -EIO;
goto out2;
}
@@ -3501,8 +3502,8 @@ int ext4_ext_map_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
if (unlikely(ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EOFBLOCKS))) {
if (unlikely(!eh->eh_entries)) {
EXT4_ERROR_INODE(inode,
- "eh->eh_entries == 0 ee_block %d",
- ex->ee_block);
+ "eh->eh_entries == 0 and "
+ "EOFBLOCKS_FL set");
err = -EIO;
goto out2;
}
--
1.6.6.1.1.g974db.dirty
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
