Re: [PATCH 3/3] ext4: don't use quota reservation for speculative metadata blocks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 04:55:52PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Because we can badly over-reserve metadata when we
> calculate worst-case, it complicates things for quota, since
> we must reserve and then claim later, retry on EDQUOT, etc.
> Quota is also a generally smaller pool than fs free blocks,
> so this over-reservation hurts more, and more often.
> 
> I'm of the opinion that it's not the worst thing to allow
> metadata to push a user slightly over quota.  This simplifies
> the code and avoids the false quota rejections that result
> from worst-case speculation.
> 
> This patch stops the speculative quota-charging for
> worst-case metadata requirements, and just charges quota
> when the blocks are allocated at writeout.  It also is
> able to remove the try-again loop on EDQUOT.
> 
> This patch has been tested indirectly by running the xfstests
> suite with a hack to mount & enable quota prior to the test.
> 
> I also did a more specific test of fragmenting freespace
> and then doing a large delalloc write under quota; quota
> stopped me at the right amount of file IO, and then the
> writeout generated enough metadata (due to the fragmentation)
> that it put me slightly over quota, as expected.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>

Applied to the ext4 patch queue; there were slight adjustments to make
the patch apply.

Note: I did some testing of this patch, and found the following
warnings getting emitted when I ran fsstress:

fsstress -d /scratch/fsstress -n 100 -p 10

[   93.338647] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = sdc1, blocknr = 594944). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[   93.390107] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = sdc1, blocknr = 594944). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[  149.249765] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = sdc1, blocknr = 594142). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[  149.305717] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = sdc1, blocknr = 594142). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[  152.523048] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = sdc1, blocknr = 590048). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[  152.544641] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = sdc1, blocknr = 590048). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[  154.147876] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = sdc1, blocknr = 590049). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.
[  154.192645] JBD: Spotted dirty metadata buffer (dev = sdc1, blocknr = 590049). There's a risk of filesystem corruption in case of system crash.

... but I found the same warning messages after I removed your patch,
so presumably this is a pre-existing condition with quotas and ext4.
Has anyone looked into this?

					- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux