[PATCH] fix the extent validity checking in e2fsck

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This patch changes e2fsck to use the same checking on the validity of an extent
as the kernel ext4 is using.

Signed-off-by: Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@xxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/e2fsck/pass1.c b/e2fsck/pass1.c
index 3c6f91c..c5dc01a 100644
--- a/e2fsck/pass1.c
+++ b/e2fsck/pass1.c
@@ -1690,8 +1690,8 @@ static void scan_extent_node(e2fsck_t ctx, struct problem_context *pctx,
 		is_dir = LINUX_S_ISDIR(pctx->inode->i_mode);
 
 		problem = 0;
-		if (extent.e_pblk < ctx->fs->super->s_first_data_block ||
-		    extent.e_pblk >= ext2fs_blocks_count(ctx->fs->super))
+		if (extent.e_pblk <= ctx->fs->super->s_first_data_block ||
+		    extent.e_pblk > ext2fs_blocks_count(ctx->fs->super))
 			problem = PR_1_EXTENT_BAD_START_BLK;
 		else if (extent.e_lblk < start_block)
 			problem = PR_1_OUT_OF_ORDER_EXTENTS;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux