Re: [PATCH] Prevent creation of files larger than RLIMIT_FSIZE using fallocate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday 01 May 2010 12:34:26 Amit K. Arora wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 02:33:19PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > (Amit Arora <aarora@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote fallocate.  cc added)
> 
> Thanks for adding me to CC.
> 
> > On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:14:06 +0530
> >
> > Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Here is an updated patch that takes the i_mutex and calls
> > > inode_newsize_ok() only for regular files.
> >
> > err, no.  It's taking i_lock where it meant to take i_mutex.
> >
> > > Thanks
> > > Nikanth
> > >
> > > +	if (S_ISREG(inode->i_mode)) {
> > > +		spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> > > +		ret = inode_newsize_ok(inode, (offset + len));
> > > +		spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> > > +		if (ret)
> > > +			return ret;
> > > +	} else if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
> > > +		/*
> > > +		 * Let individual file system decide if it supports
> > > +		 * preallocation for directories or not.
> > > +		 */
> > > +		if (offset > inode->i_sb->s_maxbytes)
> > > +			return -EFBIG;
> > > +	} else
> > > +		return -ENODEV;
> > > +
> > >  	if (!inode->i_op->fallocate)
> > >  		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >
> > Also, there doesn't seem to be much point in doing
> >
> > 	mutex_lock(i_mutex);
> > 	if (some_condition)
> > 		bale out
> > 	mutex_unlock(i_mutex);
> >
> > 	<stuff>
> >
> > because `some_condition' can now become true before or during the
> > execution of `stuff'.
> >
> > IOW, it's racy.
> 

oh, yes. :(

> Agreed. How about doing this check in the filesystem specific fallocate
> inode routines instead ? For example, in ext4 we could do :
> 

I guess, calling the filesystem specific fallocate with the lock held would 
create lock ordering problems? If so, this might be the only way. But it would 
be better to document at the call site, that the callee should check for 
RLIMIT_FSIZE.

Thanks
Nikanth

> diff -Nuarp linux-2.6.org/fs/ext4/extents.c linux-2.6.new/fs/ext4/extents.c
> --- linux-2.6.org/fs/ext4/extents.c	2010-05-01 12:16:07.000000000 +0530
> +++ linux-2.6.new/fs/ext4/extents.c	2010-05-01 12:17:37.000000000 +0530
> @@ -3672,6 +3672,11 @@ long ext4_fallocate(struct inode *inode,
>  	 */
>  	credits = ext4_chunk_trans_blocks(inode, max_blocks);
>  	mutex_lock(&inode->i_mutex);
> +	ret = inode_newsize_ok(inode, (offset + len));
> +	if (ret) {
> +		mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
>  retry:
>  	while (ret >= 0 && ret < max_blocks) {
>  		block = block + ret;
> 
> 
> Similarly for ocfs2, btrfs and xfs..
> 
> --
> Regards,
> Amit Arora
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux