On Tue, Apr 20, Jamie Lokier wrote: > Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Apr 2010, Valerie Aurora wrote: > > > I don't recall there being any technical reason not to look up the > > > real inode number. I just wrote it that we because I was lazy. So I > > > like returning the directory's d_ino better than a single magic > > > number, but I'd at least like to try returning the real inode number > > > too. > > > > Note, "struct dirent" doesn't have d_dev, so you really can't return > > the "real" inode number, that's on a different filesystem and just a > > random number in the context of the the readdir in question. > > Agree. Does this inappropriate inode number for the union mount's > st_dev happen with stat() on the actual files too? That could be bad. No, for stat() you do a lookup and that is returning the correct dentry/inode for the filesystem the name is on. We just return the the fallthru directory entries to give userspace an offset that they can seekdir() to. Regards, Jan -- Jan Blunck <jblunck@xxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
