On 08:52, Andrew Vasquez wrote: > The driver here is simply reporting that the a command's timeout value > had been exceeded and the mid-layer began error-recovery with a request > to 'abort' the command. The abort-request completed successfully: > > qla2xxx 0000:06:09.0: scsi(0:0:0): Abort command issued -- 1 fa6a73 2002. > > I can't explain why the storage did not complete the request in the > allotted time. Ah, that's valuable information, thanks. The underlying Infortrend Raid System is rather old but worked without any problems for several years. We recently replaced its 400G disks by new 2T WD disks. Maybe the new disks have longer response times, could that be the reason? And is there a way to increase the timeout value? Andre -- The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson Crusoe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
