tytso@xxxxxxx writes: > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 05:33:14PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: >> BTW I'm too familiar with cross-devel-tree process >> If tytso@ will get the patchset will you get an quota-related patches >> to linux-fs tree too? Otherwise everybody have to wait for ext4-tree >> push to linus's tree and when to linux-fs. > > I've already asked Jan if he would mind my carrying the quota patches > in the ext4 tree, since I believe there's less chance of patch > collisions with upcoming changes in the quota tree than if they were > carried in the quota tree and we had to worry about changes to the > ext4 tree. Yess. i do understand that both interesting in common quota-related peace. > > These patches are also low-risk enough (they'll either work or they > won't, and it's not hard to desk-check them for correctness) that we > could push them to Linus now before the merge window, and see if he's > willing to take them. I have some data corruption bugfixes I need to > push to Linus anyway.... I dunno if Linus will be willing to take > them, but that's the other approach. > > - Ted Both options is too complex (as least for my tiny brain) Is is possible to accept quota related patches in both(linux-fs and ext4) tires at least in for-next branches. Seems that git is able to detect equivalent patches via cherry-picking-like mechanisms. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
