On Thu, Apr 08 2010, Jeff Moyer wrote: > Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 01:00:45PM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > > >> I like the concept, it's definitely useful (and your results amply > >> demonstrate that). I was thinking if there was a way in through the ioc > >> itself, rather than bdi -> queue and like you are doing. But I can't > >> think of a nice way to do it, so this is probably as good as it gets. > >> > > > > I think, one issue with ioc based approach will be that it will then call > > yield operation on all the devices in the system where this context has ever > > done any IO. With bdi based approach this call will remain limited to > > a smaller set of devices. > > Which actually brings up the question of whether this needs some > knowledge of whether the journal is on the same device as the file > system! In such a case, we need not yield. I think I'll stick my head > in the sand for this one. ;-) Yes, that is true. But that should be relatively easy to check. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
