On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 04:41:48PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote: > > Sorry, Ted, what I meant to say was that iozone showed differences > > between deadline and cfq, where cfq's performance was much worse than > > deadline's. > > And to be 100% clear, with the patch, the performance differences > between deadline and cfq were in the noise. Right, and since most people don't actually change the I/O scheduler from cfq, this is basically a performance improvement patch, which is how I'm going to describe it. :-) - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
