Re: [PATCH] mke2fs: skip alignment questioning if -F specified

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2010-03-11, at 19:48, tytso@xxxxxxx wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 01:53:09PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
RH bug 569021 - mke2fs insists on user interaction even if stdin is not a tty and -F is passed

This is just a warning, -F should easily override it.

Since this is just a warning, do we really need to have "-F" at all? I dislike requiring "-F" on common actions, because it means that it will commonly be used, but may accidentally override some unintended problem.

We've lived without block device alignment until now, and it seems somewhat unpleasant that mke2fs may start failing (if -F is not given) for situations where it previously worked just fine.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux