Re: what exactly is CONFIG_EXT4_USE_FOR_EXT23 for?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 01:54:42PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> As long as it doesn't contaminate the "core" then sure, but the more twisty
> paths we have, the less likely any of them will be maintainable.  :)
> 
> I just think that before adding more knobs, we need to take a long hard
> look at what it does to the big picture.  When documenting ext4 upstream,
> how many "if ... else if ... else if" clauses do we need?

Fair enough.

I'm all for proposals to get rid of some knobs, too, if we don't think
they serve a purpose.  Recent examples that we've started deprecated
include minixdf --- and I really wonder if we need t have explicit
mount options to enable xattr and acl's.  Anyone object if we just
enable them all the time by default?

              	    	    	    - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux