http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15420 --- Comment #7 from Thomas Bächler <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-03-10 12:36:12 --- (In reply to comment #5) > This sounds like the block reservation code for delayed allocation is > over-aggressive about estimating how many blocks are need for the indirect > blocks in the case of indirect-mapped inodes (which would be what you get when > mounting an ext2 filesystem using the ext4 file system driver). > > This should be an aesthetic issue only, but it would be nice to have this be > fixed. It is not purely aesthetic, lots of applications abort their operation if space is supposedly running low. However, as this doesn't seem to be high priority for anyone here, we should probably consider disabling EXT4_USE_FOR_EXT23 in our distribution kernel for the time being. (In reply to comment #6) > Won't it make sence to use 'nodelalloc' by default when ext4 driver is used > for ext2 or ext3 filesystem? Because delayed allocation has some implications > people need not expect - like the overestimation of needed blocks, or changed > semantics of ordered data mode etc... Don't see a patch here. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug.-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
