Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Haven't dug all the way through it but I think this is another
> in the saga of blk_t vs. blk64_t. This seems to fix (?) it:
>
> --- a/lib/ext2fs/mkjournal.c
> +++ b/lib/ext2fs/mkjournal.c
> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ struct mkjournal_struct {
> };
>
> static int mkjournal_proc(ext2_filsys fs,
> - blk_t *blocknr,
> + blk64_t *blocknr,
> e2_blkcnt_t blockcnt,
> blk_t ref_block EXT2FS_ATTR((unused)),
> int ref_offset EXT2FS_ATTR((unused)),
>
> though I doubt that is correct/complete.
Humm my git tree is not what I thought it was, the above might be a
wild goose chase, sorry.
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
