Re: [PATCH 16/23] ext4: Update richacl incompat flag value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 11:04:58AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> Update the incompat flag value so that we don't
> conflict with ext4 features which are not yet
> upstream but are in use.

In general, for any patches that just fix problems in preceding patches,
could you just fold those into the preceding patches?

--b.

> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  fs/ext4/ext4.h |    4 +++-
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index 13df624..bcbff59 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -1133,7 +1133,9 @@ static inline int ext4_valid_inum(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino)
>  #define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT		0x0080
>  #define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_MMP               0x0100
>  #define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FLEX_BG		0x0200
> -#define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RICHACL		0x0400
> +#define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_EA_INODE		0x0400
> +#define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_RICHACL		0x0800
> +#define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_DIRDATA		0x1000
>  
>  #define EXT4_FEATURE_COMPAT_SUPP	EXT2_FEATURE_COMPAT_EXT_ATTR
>  #define EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_SUPP	(EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_FILETYPE| \
> -- 
> 1.7.0.rc0.48.gdace5
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux