Re: [PATCHv2 2/3] ext4: use direct_IO_no_locking in ext4 DIO read

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Oops, this should be [PATCHv2 3/3].

Jiaying

On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>    ext4: Use direct_IO_no_locking in ext4 dio read.
>
>    Signed-off-by: Jiaying Zhang <jiayingz@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 9ee3550..44d2e19 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -3395,7 +3395,15 @@ static ssize_t ext4_ind_direct_IO(int rw, struct kiocb *iocb,
>        }
>
>  retry:
> -       ret = blockdev_direct_IO(rw, iocb, inode, inode->i_sb->s_bdev, iov,
> +       if (rw == READ && test_opt(inode->i_sb, DIOREAD_NOLOCK)
> +                       && (EXT4_I(inode)->i_flags & EXT4_EXTENTS_FL))
> +               ret = blockdev_direct_IO_no_locking(rw, iocb, inode,
> +                                inode->i_sb->s_bdev, iov,
> +                                offset, nr_segs,
> +                                ext4_get_block, NULL);
> +       else
> +               ret = blockdev_direct_IO(rw, iocb, inode,
> +                                inode->i_sb->s_bdev, iov,
>                                 offset, nr_segs,
>                                 ext4_get_block, NULL);
>        if (ret == -ENOSPC && ext4_should_retry_alloc(inode->i_sb, &retries))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux