2009/12/16 Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>: > On Thu 10-12-09 20:22:16, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: >> >> drop i_block_reservation_lock before vfs_dq_reserve_block(). >> this patch fix http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14739 >> >> changes from previous version: >> - simplify the patch according to Jan's comments > Dmitry, I suppose I should also merge this patch together with your other > fixes, right? For some reason, it was not part of the last submission of > your patch series... yes. it is not in the series because it is another bug, and it is not depended from other patches. Please merge newst version of the patch http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/40896/ This version is affected by stupid bug, see at the bottom of the patch. In fact this patch does help Justin Maggard to overcome his issue. BTW i've also have another patch http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/40805/ it was acked by you, but ASAIK it was't pushed to the ext4 queue yet. > > Honza > >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> fs/ext4/inode.c | 6 +++--- >> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c >> index 942e183..2327f7a 100644 >> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c >> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c >> @@ -1851,6 +1851,7 @@ repeat: >> >> md_needed = mdblocks - EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_meta_blocks; >> total = md_needed + nrblocks; >> + spin_unlock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_block_reservation_lock); >> >> /* >> * Make quota reservation here to prevent quota overflow >> @@ -1858,12 +1859,10 @@ repeat: >> * time. >> */ >> if (vfs_dq_reserve_block(inode, total)) { >> - spin_unlock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_block_reservation_lock); >> return -EDQUOT; >> } >> >> if (ext4_claim_free_blocks(sbi, total)) { >> - spin_unlock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_block_reservation_lock); >> vfs_dq_release_reservation_block(inode, total); >> if (ext4_should_retry_alloc(inode->i_sb, &retries)) { >> yield(); >> @@ -1871,10 +1870,11 @@ repeat: >> } >> return -ENOSPC; >> } >> + spin_lock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_block_reservation_lock); >> EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks += nrblocks; >> EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_meta_blocks = mdblocks; ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ meta_blocks may be changed after we dropped the lock, so we have to use add here: EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_meta_blocks += mb_needed; I've overlooked this simple bug, and in fact i'm able to catch it only with havy io load ./fsstress -p16 ..... >> - >> spin_unlock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_block_reservation_lock); >> + >> return 0; /* success */ >> } >> >> -- >> 1.6.0.4 >> > -- > Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > SUSE Labs, CR > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
