On Tue 08-12-09 16:21:09, tytso@xxxxxxx wrote: > On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 12:00:43PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: > > Hi Ted, > > > > do you plan on merging my fixes for writev filesystem corruption and > > 64-bit quota patches? The writev patch is independent of any other patch > > and should go in ASAP, 64-bit quota patch depends on generic quota code > > change so either I can merge it or you can merge a bit later (it's a small > > change for ext4). > > Why don't I take the writev patch, and let you merge the 64-bit quota > patch along with the generic quota changes? Does that make sense? Yes, fine for me. I just didn't want to merge ext4 quota changes without your approval. > The only thing that worries me a tiny bit is that there are some quota > bug fixes which the OpenVZ folks have submitted, that I need to review > and haven't gotten to yet, and there's a chance they may conflict with > your 64-bit ext4 quota changes. But I'm sure we can deal with any > potential merge conflicts should they come up. Yes, I need to take a look at those as well. So far they don't seem to be conflicting AFAICS. Honza -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
