Re: [PATCH 14/41] whiteout: Split of ext2_append_link() from ext2_add_link()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In message <1256152779-10054-15-git-send-email-vaurora@xxxxxxxxxx>, Valerie Aurora writes:
> From: Jan Blunck <jblunck@xxxxxxx>
> 
> The ext2_append_link() is later used to find or append a directory
> entry to whiteout.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ---
>  fs/ext2/dir.c |   70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext2/dir.c b/fs/ext2/dir.c
> index 6cde970..cb8ceff 100644
> --- a/fs/ext2/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ext2/dir.c
> @@ -472,9 +472,10 @@ void ext2_set_link(struct inode *dir, struct ext2_dir_entry_2 *de,
>  }
>  
>  /*
> - *	Parent is locked.
> + * Find or append a given dentry to the parent directory
>   */
> -int ext2_add_link (struct dentry *dentry, struct inode *inode)
> +static ext2_dirent * ext2_append_entry(struct dentry * dentry,
> +				       struct page ** page)

I thought checkpatch didn't want to see spaces after a '*', so
"struct foo * ptr" should become "struct foo *ptr".

I also think that "struct page **page" should be renamed to "struct page
**ppage" or "struct page **pages", to avoid confusion with many other
functions which pass a "struct page *" pointer to a variable named "page".

Erez.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux