tytso@xxxxxxx wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 04:12:33PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote: >> On Mon 16-11-09 16:50:49, Eric Sandeen wrote: >>> Users on the list recently complained about differences across >>> filesystems w.r.t. how to mount without a journal replay. >>> >>> In the discussion it was noted that xfs's "norecovery" option is >>> perhaps more descriptively accurate than "noload," so let's make >>> that an alias for ext3. >>> >>> Also show this status in /proc/mounts >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> >> OK, provided ext4 will have the same change, I'm fine with the patch. >> So how is it with ext4? > > Queued for the next merge window. I did slightly change the > documentation in Documentation/filesystems/ext4.txt to make > "norecovery" be the canonnical option name, since that's what Eric had > show up in /proc/mounts. That seems fair, we might as well try to add > consistency between different Linux filesystems. > > - Ted FWIW, the nilfs folks just added an option to do the same thing, and I steered them towards "norecovery" - we may just get some consistency, yet! -Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
