On Sun 15-11-09 21:40:42, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > We don't to issue an I/O barrier on an error or if we force commit > because we are doing data journaling. > > Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx> > Cc: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> > --- > This patch should be equivalent to Jan's "ext4: Avoid issuing barriers > on error recovery path", but it removes more lines than it adds. :-) Yeah, it looks fine. Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> Honza > > fs/ext4/fsync.c | 8 +++----- > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/fsync.c b/fs/ext4/fsync.c > index 2b15312..a3c2507 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/fsync.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/fsync.c > @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ int ext4_sync_file(struct file *file, struct dentry *dentry, int datasync) > > ret = flush_aio_dio_completed_IO(inode); > if (ret < 0) > - goto out; > + return ret; > /* > * data=writeback: > * The caller's filemap_fdatawrite()/wait will sync the data. > @@ -79,10 +79,8 @@ int ext4_sync_file(struct file *file, struct dentry *dentry, int datasync) > * (they were dirtied by commit). But that's OK - the blocks are > * safe in-journal, which is all fsync() needs to ensure. > */ > - if (ext4_should_journal_data(inode)) { > - ret = ext4_force_commit(inode->i_sb); > - goto out; > - } > + if (ext4_should_journal_data(inode)) > + return ext4_force_commit(inode->i_sb); > > if (!journal) > ret = sync_mapping_buffers(inode->i_mapping); > -- > 1.6.5.216.g5288a.dirty > -- Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html