On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 02:43:42AM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > This is a partial revert of commit 6487a9d (only the changes made to > fs/ext4/namei.c), since it is causing the following brelse() of an > already free buffer when running fsstress on a file system with 1k > blocksize: This description isn't quite right. I did get this error while running fsstress on a file system with a 1k blocksize, but the real problem was that I was using a device that wasn't big enough for fsstress, and it was really an ENOSPC error while extending a directory from 1 block. Curt's patch didn't take into account that the call to ext4_append() in make_indexed_dir() could also return ENOSPC, that would cause a double brelse(). I suppose I could have fixed it up by adding an explicit check for ENOSPC and not freeing the buffer head in that one return path, which would have made for a smaller patch, but the resulting code would be really horrible. So I still think the best thing to do for now is to partially revert commit 6487a9d now, and fix things up cleanly after 2.6.32 is released. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html