Re: [PATCH] fs/ext4: test the i_flags field of the right structure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Julia Lawall wrote:
From: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx>

Elsewhere, EXT4_EXTENTS_FL is combined with EXT4_I(inode)->i_flags, rather
than inode->i_flags.

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@xxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>

---
 fs/ext4/inode.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 5c5bc5d..c0e34ab 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -2787,7 +2787,7 @@ static int ext4_da_writepages_trans_blocks(struct inode *inode)
 	 * number of contiguous block. So we will limit
 	 * number of contiguous block to a sane value
 	 */
-	if (!(inode->i_flags & EXT4_EXTENTS_FL) &&
+	if (!(EXT4_I(inode)->i_flags & EXT4_EXTENTS_FL) &&
 	    (max_blocks > EXT4_MAX_TRANS_DATA))
 		max_blocks = EXT4_MAX_TRANS_DATA;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux