Re: [Bug 14354] Re: ext4 increased intolerance to unclean shutdown?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Parag Warudkar wrote:
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 6:15 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V
<aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Can you try this patch ?

commit a8836b1d6f92273e001012c7705ae8f4c3d5fb65
Author: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:   Tue Oct 27 15:36:38 2009 +0530

   ext4: discard preallocation during truncate

   We need to make sure when we drop and reacquire the inode's
   i_data_sem we discard the inode preallocation. Otherwise we
   could have blocks marked as free in bitmap but still belonging
   to prealloc space.

Just wanted to let you know that I have applied this patch and one
unclean shutdown later it seems to have not given me any trouble.

I will continue testing it - hopefully I won't have to reformat  this
time ( every time I tested previously I ended up having weird issues
that I decided to get rid of by reformatting /).

I've been running my testcase, and I just hit the usual corruption with this patch in place after 8 iterations, I'm afraid.

-Eric

Parag
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux