On Sep 18, 2009 09:04 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Andreas Dilger wrote: >>> + rc = blkid_probe_set_device(pr, fd, 0, 0); >> >> Is this in the e2fsprogs blkid code yet? I'm guessing not, since you > > right, not yet. I don't know what the long-term plan is for e2fsprogs > blkid; keeping 2 trees in sync seems like a lot of work w/o much gain... I thought that was Ted's plan? We usually recommend people to update to the latest e2fsprogs, yet not everyone will be able to upgrade to the latest util-linux, especially if it is pulling in other libraries that can cause package conflicts (e.g. with xfstools or similar). >> Either this needs to be configured in, or you need to upgrade the >> blkid included with e2fsprogs to handle this. > > Yep, that's why I said "It'll also need some config-fu to be sure we've > got a blkid which has these calls...." :) and why I was asking about > moving the in-tree headers slightly out of the way. Sigh, it helps if I read the whole email, I guess... :-) Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
