On Wed, Sep 09, 2009 at 10:34:24AM -0700, Frank Mayhar wrote: > Teach ext4_write_inode() and ext4_do_update_inode() about non-journal > mode: If we're not using a journal, ext4_write_inode() now calls > ext4_do_update_inode() (after getting the iloc via ext4_get_inode_loc()) > with a new "do_sync" parameter. If that parameter is nonzero _and_ we're > not using a journal, ext4_do_update_inode() calls sync_dirty_buffer() > instead of ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(). > > This problem was found in power-fail testing, checking the amount of > loss of files and blocks after a power failure when using fsync() and > when not using fsync(). It turned out that using fsync() was actually > worse than not doing so, possibly because it increased the likelihood > that the inodes would remain unflushed and would therefore be lost at > the power failure. > > Signed-off-by: Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@xxxxxxxxxx> Added to the ext4 patch queue, thanks. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
