> ... }
> diff --git a/e2fsck/super.c b/e2fsck/super.c
> index 409d472..b8eee6b 100644
> --- a/e2fsck/super.c
> +++ b/e2fsck/super.c
> @@ -637,8 +637,8 @@ void check_super_block(e2fsck_t ctx)
> should_be = 0;
> if (!ext2fs_group_desc_csum_verify(fs, i)) {
> if (fix_problem(ctx, PR_0_GDT_CSUM, &pctx)) {
> - ext2fs_bg_flag_clear (fs, i, EXT2_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT);
> - ext2fs_bg_flag_clear (fs, i, EXT2_BG_INODE_UNINIT);
> + ext2fs_bg_flags_clear(fs, i, EXT2_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT);
> + ext2fs_bg_flags_clear(fs, i, EXT2_BG_INODE_UNINIT);
> ext2fs_bg_itable_unused_set(fs, i, 0);
> should_be = 1;
> }
Wouldn't something like this be better? There are a few places where this
could be done:
> - ext2fs_bg_flag_clear (fs, i, EXT2_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT);
> - ext2fs_bg_flag_clear (fs, i, EXT2_BG_INODE_UNINIT);
> + ext2fs_bg_flags_clear(fs, i, EXT2_BG_BLOCK_UNINIT | EXT2_BG_INODE_UNINIT);
Thanks,
Nick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
