On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 03:04:38PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > Acked-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> > But would the patch below be better? When we force a transaction > commit we don't have to flush caches again. Or am I missing something? If you know that you really did issue a barrier for sure you don't have to flush the cache again. I don't know extN enough to easily figure out how, but if this patch ensures that it's good. Same scheme should also apply to ext4. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
