Justin Maggard wrote: > On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Andreas Dilger<adilger@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Sep 01, 2009 16:43 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >>> ext2fs_open2() was only looking at s_blocks_count, and >>> when it wrapped to a low number, it was failing the test of: >>> >>> fs->super->s_first_data_block >= fs->super->s_blocks_count >>> >>> which made the superblock look corrupt. >> Is this the source of the "e2fsck is finding bad checksums" problem? > > I applied this earlier today, and it didn't appear to help in my test case. > > -Justin Nah, didn't expect it to, but I'm working towards that. Just have to whack down the bugs between where I am, and your bug ;) -Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html